[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:28:53 +0100 |
Hi Graham,
2012/2/24 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:37:12PM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> 2012/2/21 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> > You just did not try hard enough. It was a really obscure bug in the
>> > lexer. I'll commit a fix to staging once make check goes through.
>>
>> not sure I understand.
>
> David's trying to be funny. He does this from time to time; it's
> a bit embarrassing, but just nod and smile.
>
> ^
> |
> +-- by the way, the above was me trying to be funny. Nod and
> smile.
lol
>
>> Or do you mean, that I've no realistic chance because of the lexer-bug?
>
> It means that you had no chance due to that bug. David has fixed
> the bug, so stay tuned for 2.15.31 whenever it comes out.
Well, I have to do some clean up, but apart from this last file the
main work seems to be done, so far normal users can do.
Or missed I something?
Thanks,
Harm
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Hézaine, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/25