[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 04:27:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
David Nalesnik <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi,
>
> > It means that you had no chance due to that bug. David has
> fixed
> > the bug, so stay tuned for 2.15.31 whenever it comes out.
>
>
> Possibly stupid question: does this mean that the LSR update will need
> to bypass 2.14.2 and wait for stable 2.16?
I don't know when it was that the bug appeared. If it turns out that
this is a problem, it should be reasonably easy to rewrite the snippet
in a manner that does not trigger the bug.
I think it was something like \lyricsto "xxx" \music \musicfunction
... and it would likely already do to write \lyricsto "xxx" { \music }
\musicfunction ...
--
David Kastrup
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Hézaine, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Hézaine, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/26