[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2
From: |
Colin Hall |
Subject: |
Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 |
Date: |
Fri, 25 May 2012 01:40:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
> In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
> together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is
> not beamed with the others:
>
> \relative c'' {
> \time 3/4
> c8 c c c c c
> r c c c c c
> }
Hi Nick,
Thanks for reporting this unexpected behaviour and for stimulating
some useful discussion. It seems that:
Default beaming for this case changed from 2.14.2 to 2.15.39.
A workaround has been provided to restore the previous behaviour.
Graham, as project manager, has confirmed this should not be classed as a
regression.
Phil Holmes has identified the change to beaming that is most likely
responsible.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2246
which is titled "beaming in 3/4 - a setting to not beam 3 eights
against the beat" so it looks like the design is not clear.
There is an existing, open tracker for beaming in 3/4:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1817
I'm creating a tracker so that someone can take up the task of
designing this feature.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2566
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2,
Colin Hall <=