[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tunefl and other web services
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: tunefl and other web services |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2012 05:43:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
I don't drink beer.
- Graham
:)
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:40:52AM -0400, Mike Blackstock wrote:
> ok,ok, ok - I'll remove the model, you guys win. sigh.
>
> It's not a real Debian ad? What a shame, it should be.
>
> I'm going for a beer - let's agree on that at least ?
>
> ;)
>
> -Mike
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 05:57:02AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Mike Blackstock <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > I agree. As I pointed out, the model was meant to personify
> Aquinas'
> > > definition of 'beauty' and tie that in with the beauty of Lilypond.
> We
> > > disagree on what 'sleaze' is. Not how 'gatekeeper' comes into play
> and
> > > as for marketing - well, this is free, and I'm defering to the
> > > judgment of the Debian Linux ad, as I thought I made clear.
> >
> > The Debian ad goes to a bit more effort than depicting an arbitrary
> > snapshot of a woman in a swimsuit. And I still don't see them
> pulling
> > this off convincingly either.
>
> Wait a moment -- *what* Debian ad? The [3]2.bp.blogspot.com image
> has the url linu...[4]blogspot.com, which redirects me to some
> spam-ish site. There's no way that's an official Debian
> advertisement.
> Look folks, anybody can slap some text onto an image. Back in
> 2001, I found a set of jpegs of naked girls that somebody had
> photoshopped (or "gimped") Linux mascots onto. Those weren't
> official "linux" advertisements; it was obviously just some horny
> teenagers who thought it would be cute[1] to slap some Linux
> penguins onto chicks.
> [1] to be fair, at the time I was in my very early 20s, and I
> thought it was funny too. Also, there was one picture of a girl
> in a waterfall that was particularly hot. I can't remember any
> specifics of the images, though.
> - Graham
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> [6]https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:address@hidden
> 2. mailto:address@hidden
> 3. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/
> 4. http://blogspot.com/
> 5. mailto:address@hidden
> 6. https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: tunefl and other web services, (continued)
- Re: tunefl and other web services, David Rogers, 2012/07/11
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Graham Percival, 2012/07/11
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Mike Blackstock, 2012/07/11
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Josiah Boothby, 2012/07/11
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Mike Blackstock, 2012/07/11
- Re: tunefl and other web services, David Kastrup, 2012/07/12
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Graham Percival, 2012/07/12
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Mike Blackstock, 2012/07/12
- Re: tunefl and other web services,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Mike Blackstock, 2012/07/12
- Re: tunefl and other web services, David Kastrup, 2012/07/12
- Re: tunefl and other web services, David Kastrup, 2012/07/12
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Mike Blackstock, 2012/07/11
Re: tunefl and other web services, Mike Blackstock, 2012/07/11
Message not available
RE: tunefl and other web services, Philip Thomas, 2012/07/12