[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:42:43 +0200 (CEST) |
>> So, i still think that we shouldn't allow "c2 4 4" despite some
>> really nice benefits it could bring us.
>
> Well, it won't affect previously valid programs. And it would have
> some nice side effects, including
>
> c4~ | 1~ | 2.
>
> with or without bar checks or spaces, and reasonably straightforward
> underpinnings and semantics.
So let's keep that as one of the first results of our GLISS
discussion, together with your suggestions for improved syntax of
\tempo.
Werner
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/21
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, James, 2012/09/24
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/23
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, James, 2012/09/24
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/23
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/23
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/23