[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:23:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>> good point. So, i still think that we shouldn't allow "c2 4 4"
>>> despite some really nice benefits it could bring us.
>>
>> Well, it won't affect previously valid programs.
>
> Now i'm *totally* puzzled. What do you mean by "programs"? Do you
> mean that allowing standalone durations, like c2 d 4 4 => c2 d2 d4 d4,
The first 4 in there is not standalone, so c2 d 4 4 => c2 d4 d4 and
c2 d2 4 4 => c2 d2 d4 d4
> wouldn't cause incompatibility with old scores?
Your rule would, but that's not what I consider "standalone".
> Also, i remember you saying that allowing whitespace before duration
> is needed for example in music functions:
>
> makeAquarterNote = #(define-music-function (parser location note)
> (ly:pitch?)
> #{ $note 4 #})
>
> How could this function be written if we allowed standalone durations
> that repeat previous pitch?
"standalone" has nothing to do with spaces. It just means that the
duration has no preceding note to attach to.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, (continued)
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/21
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/21
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/23
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/23
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/23
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/23
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax,
David Kastrup <=
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, James, 2012/09/24
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/23
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, James, 2012/09/24
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/23
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/23
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/23
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Stefan Thomas, 2012/09/20