[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mea máxima culpa
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: mea máxima culpa |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:17:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Rogers <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> As I said, replies from a digest rarely make sense because of breaking
>> the message threading.
>
> This is true, or at least I'm willing to take it as true - but if a
> digest exists, then it would be very strange and frustrating to try to
> disallow replying to it. Otherwise, if a digest subscriber wanted to
> reply to something, he'd have to travel backwards in time and subscribe
> himself to the individual messages instead, in time to catch the one he
> was interested in. :)
Look it up on Gmane and reply to it individually. I've actually done
that more than once. Yes, it's inconvenient.
It's easier to read the whole traffic on a Gmane interface (I use Gmane
via nntp).
--
David Kastrup
- Re: mea máxima culpa, (continued)
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Rogers, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Evan Driscoll, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Brian Barker, 2013/09/12