[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mea máxima culpa
From: |
James Harkins |
Subject: |
Re: mea máxima culpa |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Sep 2013 01:42:23 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Well yes, a thread is logically a _tree_. A chronological sort only
> renders a list, and that's just not useful for tracking a particular
> conversation to its start.
FWIW, I receive the digest and when I want to reply to a message, I use gmane.
It's slightly less convenient, but I consider it to be at least polite. As far
as I know, it does handle the headers properly.
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general
Incidentally, if you look at recent posts via gmane, you'll see that the
broken threads are totally obvious.
hjh
- Re: mea máxima culpa, (continued)
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Tim Roberts, 2013/09/11
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Tim Roberts, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Rogers, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Evan Driscoll, 2013/09/12