[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New LilyPond website
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: New LilyPond website |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:47:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0 |
Am 29.11.2016 um 11:25 schrieb Federico Bruni:
> What John did can be easily done with a static site generator, which
> would have many more chances to get accepted by LilyPond developers.
One point that hasn't been raised in *this* thread is that using any CMS
on the donated web space we have is out of question. Anyone wanting to
have a WordPress site (or anything else) would have to find a hosting
solution for this - and would probably also be responsible for keeping
that safe and running.
I personally would also be happy to have the website separate from the
docs, so it can be adapting to new ideas more easily. But I would much
more like to see it created by a static site generator, in a system
where the content can be managed as a Git repository.
This doesn't say *anything* about the visual aspect of the current
proposal, though.
Urs
Re: New LilyPond website, Johan Vromans, 2016/11/29
- Re: New LilyPond website, Urs Liska, 2016/11/29
- Re: New LilyPond website, Johan Vromans, 2016/11/29
- Re: New LilyPond website, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/29
- Re: New LilyPond website, Johan Vromans, 2016/11/29
- Re: New LilyPond website, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/29
- Re: New LilyPond website,
Urs Liska <=
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2016/11/29
- Re: New LilyPond website, Thiago Censi, 2016/11/29
- Re: New LilyPond website, David Kastrup, 2016/11/29
- Re: New LilyPond website, Thiago Censi, 2016/11/29
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2016/11/29
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2016/11/29
- Re: New LilyPond website, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/29
Re: New LilyPond website, Thiago Censi, 2016/11/29
Re: New LilyPond website, Karlin High, 2016/11/29
Re: New LilyPond website, Shane Brandes, 2016/11/29