|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Hairpin.to-barline doesn't always work |
Date: | Sat, 21 Jul 2018 09:12:55 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 |
Am 21.07.2018 um 08:55 schrieb Thomas Morley:
2018-07-21 5:08 GMT+02:00 Patrick Karl <address@hidden>:The to-barline property I have a couple of questions about this section. The first is, why would the default setting for to-barface be true?Afaik, we do so to follow the usual type-setting-rules. I could be wrong here, though. I don't own Gould
Gould (p. 105) says: "It is neatest ifa hairpin that terminates at the beginning of a bar stops short of the barline, since the space between the barline and the subsequent first beat has no time value (bars 1-3). However, it is helpful to extend a hairpint to a first beat that is some distance after a barline, to show continuity (bars 4-6).
The example given matches LilyPon's output of the following file: \paper { ragged-last = ##f } \relative { \time 2/4 a' \< e' e, \f \> c g'2 \p \override Hairpin.to-barline = ##f f4 \< bes \time 3/4 <gis b>2 \f \> c,4 \time 2/4 es2 \p }which seems correct to me. The first three bars' default behaviour matches the description, and the - optional - result of the remaining three bars is achieved by overriding the default.
HTH Urs
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |