[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Slur within a slur?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Slur within a slur? |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Dec 2023 15:52:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Peter Mayes <peter@petermayes.org> writes:
> Here is a fragment of something I am engraving.
>
> e( dis e ais, b g |
> e8) r \afterGrace d'!(\trill { cis32 d } |
> c'!16) b^. a^. g^. fis^. e^. |
>
> *
>
> The D following the \afterGrace is slurred up to the C at the beginning of the
> following bar.
>
> I would also like the "{ cis32 d }" grace notes to be slurred, but if I put
> "{ cis32( d) }", I
> get a "Warning: already have slur".
>
> Is there a way to get a "slur within a slur"?
>
> Thanks in advance
Writing
{
e( dis e ais, b g |
e8) r \afterGrace d'!(\trill { cis32\=1( d\=1) } |
c'!16) b^. a^. g^. fis^. e^. |
}
gives me
and a bar check warning.
--
David Kastrup