Re: @Cell source question

[Jason Whittle]

On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 20:24:55 +1000, Jeff Kingston <address@hidden> wrote:
> > As Edgar suggested, I've been becoming more acquainted with the
> > source, so when I wanted to make a macro that used the @Cell symbol
> > from within @Tbl, I grepped through the include directory, and found
> > that all the references to @Cell are in tblf. However, @Cell is never
> > defined, that I can tell. It's always given as a named parameter of a
> > named parameter of a symbol. How does one construct an extend path for
> > that?
> 
> Anyone who plays with the symbol structure of tbl has got to be
> crazy.  However, in principle you should be able to define a
> macro using one of the @Cell symbols like this:

My apologies; I'm still trying to learn to do things the lout way. I
eventually realized that I was defining the wrong symbols.

Cheers, 
Jason Whittle