[Ltib] Re: Building xorg-x11-proto-devel: Minor proposed fix to latest change in spec file.

[Stuart Hughes]

Hi Rodney,

Thanks for the patch, which looks okay, however before I apply it, I'm
trying to understand why at the point that code runs there's anything
except directories.

I just ran:

./ltib -p xorg-x11-proto-devel -m prep
./ltib -p xorg-x11-proto-devel -m scbuild
cd rpm/BUILD/xorg-x11-proto-devel-7.3/

and at that point if I do: ls -1 I see:

bigreqsproto-1.0.2/
compositeproto-0.4/
damageproto-1.1.0/
dmxproto-2.2.2/
dri2proto-1.1/
evieext-1.0.2/
fixesproto-4.0/
fontcacheproto-0.1.2/
fontsproto-2.0.2/
glproto-1.4.9/
inputproto-1.4.3/
kbproto-1.0.3/
randrproto-1.2.1/
recordproto-1.13.2/
renderproto-0.9.3/
resourceproto-1.0.2/
scrnsaverproto-1.1.0/
trapproto-3.4.3/
videoproto-2.2.2/
xcmiscproto-1.1.2/
xextproto-7.0.2/
xf86bigfontproto-1.1.2/
xf86dgaproto-2.0.3/
xf86driproto-2.0.4/
xf86miscproto-0.9.2/
xf86rushproto-1.1.2/
xf86vidmodeproto-2.2.2/
xineramaproto-1.1.2/
xproto-7.0.12/
xproxymanagementprotocol-1.0.2/


So I'm wondering why on your build you're seeing the weird:
        pushd COPYING-bigreqsproto

Regards, Stuart

Rodney Lott wrote:
> Hi, Stuart.
> 
> Here's a fix to the error message I found after fetching the fix to the
> xorg-x11-proto-devel.spec file:
> 
> Index: dist/lfs-5.1/xorg-x11-proto-devel/xorg-x11-proto-devel.spec
> ===================================================================
> RCS file:
> /sources/ltib/ltib/dist/lfs-5.1/xorg-x11-proto-devel/xorg-x11-proto-devel.spec,v
> retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
> diff -a -u -r1.1.1.1 xorg-x11-proto-devel.spec
> --- dist/lfs-5.1/xorg-x11-proto-devel/xorg-x11-proto-devel.spec 5 Dec
> 2008 14:25:45 -0000   1.1.1.1
> +++ dist/lfs-5.1/xorg-x11-proto-devel/xorg-x11-proto-devel.spec 15 Nov
> 2010 16:55:34 -0000
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
> 
>  %Build
>  # Proceed through each proto package directory, building them all
> -for dir in $(ls -1) ; do
> +for dir in $(ls -p | grep "/") ; do
>     pushd $dir
>     ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --host=$CFGHOST --build=%{_build}
>     make
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
> 
>  %Install
>  rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> -for dir in $(ls -1) ; do
> +for dir in $(ls -p | grep "/") ; do
>     pushd $dir
>     make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{pfx}
>     install -m 444 COPYING-${dir%%-*} $OLDPWD
> 
> The "ls -1" will include files and directories, so using "ls -p | grep
> "/"" will just grab the directories only.  I am sure there is probably a
> better way of doing this, but this seems to work for me.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Rodney Lott
> R&D Design Engineer
> Evertz Microsystems Ltd.
> 5288 John Lucas Drive
> Burlington, ON
> L7L 5Z9
> Phone: (905) 335-3700 x. 374
> Toll Free: (877) 995-3700
> Fax: (905) 335-0909
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stuart Hughes [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Sat 11/13/2010 2:16 PM
> To: Rodney Lott
> Subject: Re: Builing full xorg-server: Is there a xf86dgaproto package
> 
> Hi Rodney,
> 
> Unfortunately the full xorg-server build is not as well tested as Kdrive.
> 
> xorg-x11-proto-devel.spec provides xf86dgaproto, but the build order of
> these package was wrong (it needs to be built before xorg-server).
> 
> I have checked-in a fix for this, if you do a 'cvs up -dP' and re-run
> your build it should work (I just tried).
> 
> Regards, Stuart
> 
> 
> Rodney Lott wrote:
>> Hi, Stuart.
>>
>> As you suggested, I updated my tarball to the latest in CVS and started
>> to rebuild things, which for me includes the xorg-server package.    I
>> got to this stage in the xorg-server configure step, when it failed at
>> this point:
>>
>> checking for DGA... configure: error: Package requirements
>> (xf86dgaproto) were not met:
>>
>> No package 'xf86dgaproto' found
>>
>> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
>> installed software in a non-standard prefix.
>>
>> Alternatively, you may set the environment variables DGA_CFLAGS
>> and DGA_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
>> See the pkg-config man page for more details.
>>
>> Is there a dgaproto package that would fill this requirement?  I see
>> there is a package called libXxf86dga, but I am not sure if this is the
>> correct one.  If there is, let me know.  If not, then I will proceed in
>> making one.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Rodney
>>
>