Re: [Ltib] glibc uses wrong path to toolchain headers (in my ARM case)

[Stuart Hughes]

Hi Jurgen,

This is not a general error.  At last time of maintenance we were using
CodeSourcery toolchains and this path was/is correct for those
toolchains (the ones in the GPP).

If you have added your own toochain built with sysroot, then this path
is incorrect I guess.

What is really needed is a patch that can handle the differences in
these paths.

Regards, Stuart

On 10/10/11 16:22, Lambrecht Jürgen wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> from 'dist/lfs-5.1/glibc/glibc.spec':
> # Use the toolchain headers as the default for the glibc build unless the
> # BSP kernel headers have been selected.
> if [ "${GLIBC_WANT_KERNEL_HEADERS}" = "y" ]
> then
>      TC_HEADERS_DIR="${DEV_IMAGE}/usr/src/linux/include"
> else
>      TC_HEADERS_DIR="${TOOLCHAIN_PATH}/${OPT_CFGHOST}/libc/usr/include"
> fi
> 
> In my case, this is wrong, and it should be 'sysroot' instead of 'libc':
>      TC_HEADERS_DIR="${TOOLCHAIN_PATH}/${OPT_CFGHOST}/sysroot/usr/include"
> 
> Is this a general error? Then I can submit a patch.
> 
> FYI:
> - the complete (wrong) path: 
> TC_HEADERS_DIR=/opt/freescale/usr/local/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/usr/include
> - I noticed this only because I changed the option "C library package" 
> from the default "from toolchain only" (CONFIG_CHOICE_BASE_LIBS) to 
> "glibc" (CONFIG_CHOICE_GLIBC)
> - now the compile goes on, but I get this error:
> 
> sudo /opt/ltib/usr/bin/rpm --root /usr/src/cross/Ltib-svn/rootfs 
> --dbpath /var/lib/rpm --prefix / --ignorearch -ivh --force --excludedocs 
> --noscripts --define '_tmppath /tmp/ltib' 
> /usr/src/cross/Ltib-svn/rpm/RPMS/arm/base_libs-1.2-1.arm.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
>      libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)   is needed by base_libs-1.2-1
>      libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)   is needed by base_libs-1.2-1
> 
> But those lib's are here: 
> /opt/freescale/usr/local/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/sysroot/lib/.
> Maybe I have a problem with my toolchain?
> 
> Regards,
> Jürgen
>