lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] lwIP or uIP ?


From: Timmy Brolin
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] lwIP or uIP ?
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:10:58 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)

uIP requires extremely little RAM. uIP can work on systems with only a couple kilobytes of RAM. The disadvantage is of course low performance.
If you have more than 10kBytes of RAM and want a bit more performance, then you should use lwip.

/Timmy

Michael Ambrus wrote:
Hello,
I'm new both to this list and lwIP/uIP. Both lwIP and uIP seem to be adressing embedded TCP/IP and I'm confured about which one would be best to use.

* What is the difference between lwIP and uIP and what is either ones advantage or disadvatage compared to each other?
* Does both projects support tun/tap (if used on systems that have tun/tap i.e.)?

Regards
/Michael

_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list address@hidden http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]