[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Update code and patches "RFC" :)
From: |
Nelson Henry Eric |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Update code and patches "RFC" :) |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Oct 1996 19:51:00 +0900 (JST) |
> protocols.. For example, you know that you (or your users) never use
> "finger:" URLs? Compile a version without the HTFinger module.
> The same for Gopher, FTP, News, probably even HTTP. If you don't
It would certainly make a lot of sense for `lynx -validate'.
> of the Protocol modules, (1) exclude the relevant HTxxxx.o file from
I'd always wondered if this couldn't be done. Thanks, I'll try it this
weekend.
> It just seems from the code that it should work. Changes in more
> places would be needed to give users a sensible error message on
> tryin to acces one of the omitted protocols.)
Since Fote implemented defines for anonymous accounts, e.g.,
#define CAN_ANONYMOUS_GOTO_GOPHER TRUE, whenever a protocol is
defined FALSE, won't an anonymous user get a message even if the protocol
module isn't there?
> investigate. My current list of suspects has HTRules, HTAAServ, HTUU,
> maybe more, but that is unverified.
I'll see what I can do about testing these, too.
Thanks much! __Henry
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV Update code and patches "RFC" :), (continued)