[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV More on my SPARC/Solaris 2.4/Lynx development version crash
Nelson Henry Eric
Re: LYNX-DEV More on my SPARC/Solaris 2.4/Lynx development version crashes
Thu, 16 Oct 1997 09:52:46 +0900 (JST)
> 1. if no further work on the code is expected to occur, would it make
> sense to remove the code, or at least remove any options to activate it?
I wouldn't want to see this worthwhile experiment go down the tubes.
Just ifdef the heck out of it. If you mean, remove _references_ to the
option in up-front documents like INSTALLATION, you have a good point
(e.g., it would be easy to bury the mention of the option in userdefs.h
and remove its listing in configure --help).
> 2. if users should not report problems on this code, perhaps that would
> be worthwhile to mention in the docs?
I did a rewrite of Klaus's mention of it where he talks about the lss_file
in userdefs.h, and I could make the wording more explicit to "not report
problems on this code", but I need to understand Klaus's feeling on this
issue better before I venture any more suggestions for changes/corrections.
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.