[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field
From: |
David Combs |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Nov 1997 11:19:16 -0800 (PST) |
> From address@hidden Wed Nov 26 13:16:18 1997
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 15:21:10 -0500 (EST)
> From: address@hidden (Michael Sokolov)
> That's what I have meant. When I want to post a two-line response like this
...
What has this world come to, that one would even
THINK of doing such a thing?
(About the dirty line: oh, the poor baby, too bad
he never had the opportunity to use 110 baud on an ASR33,
noisy line for even that, paper tape for cut-and-paste.
And man, when 300 came along, was THAT fast!!!! Lord,
the mordern world had arrived!, what with the screen
of the adm5 filling SO quickly.)
- Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Foteos Macrides, 1997/11/23
- Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Foteos Macrides, 1997/11/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Foteos Macrides, 1997/11/25
- Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/11/25
- Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Michael Sokolov, 1997/11/25
- Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/11/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Michael Sokolov, 1997/11/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field,
David Combs <=