[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related)
From: |
Nelson Henry Eric |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related) |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 1998 12:15:38 +0900 (JST) |
> this will be the address from userdefs.h. Neither the individual user
> nor a system administrator needs to keep lynx.cfg at this location,
> however. If lynx.cfg is at another location, the current code will not
> find it. "lynx_cfg_file", however, ALWAYS points to the configuration
> file currently being used, which should have all the comments and
> any links to included files. I won't (and I suspect most users and
> administrators won't) keep a duplicate copy of lynx.cfg just for the
> help system to find. If the worry is that the active file will be
> shortened to only the items that are different from the compilation
> option, it is easier to specify in the INSTALLATION instructions that
> the file should not be shortened because it is also a help file, than
> to ask that a duplicate file be kept at a hardcoded help location.
I just wanted to second this. (I'm afraid my reply was not very well written.)
__Henry
- lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related), Doug Kaufman, 1998/10/08
- Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related), Leonid Pauzner, 1998/10/09
- Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related), Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/10/09
- Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related),
Nelson Henry Eric <=
- Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related), Leonid Pauzner, 1998/10/10
- Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related), Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/10/10
- Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related), Leonid Pauzner, 1998/10/10
- Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related), Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/10/11
- Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related), dickey, 1998/10/12
- Re: lynx-dev Proposed patch (DOS related), Leonid Pauzner, 1998/10/16