lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.19 patch #1 ("iso9945" problem)


From: Doug Kaufman
Subject: Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.19 patch #1 ("iso9945" problem)
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 18:25:46 -0800 (PST)

On Thu, 4 Mar 1999 address@hidden wrote:

> *** orig/lynx2-8-2/README Wed Feb 17 07:29:33 1999
> --- lynx2-8-2/README Sat Feb 20 16:24:01 1999
> ***************
> *** 142,148 ****
>      Any messages you wish to post should be sent to address@hidden
>      PLEASE use the lynx-dev list, NOT private email to the developers,
>      for questions or discussion about Lynx, or contributions of patches.
> !    Patches should use the context diff format (diff -c).

Is this statement out of date? It seems that more and more members of
the list are using universal diffs rather than context diffs. Is there a
preference one way or the other? Should we change the README file to
allow "diff -u"?
                               Doug
__
Doug Kaufman
Internet: address@hidden (preferred)
          address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]