[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Java version of Lynx
From: |
Mehran Mehr |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Java version of Lynx |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 12:43:06 +0430 (IRST) |
With special thanks to John Brajkovic, David Woolley, Klaus Weide and
Gregory J. Deckler.
I am not good in english writing, I am a programmer, and I believe modular
porogramming is better than spaghetti programming. Reading and
understanding Lynx source-code needs some kind of reverse engineering!
In order to save Lynx project, we should write its code again, more
clearer. We can divide Lynx into many sub-projects, and in this way the
core of Lynx will be small and readable. For example rendering HTML text
is a sub-project of Lynx, which can be written by an individual. We can
define many sub-projects like this (e.g. caching, http interface, ftp
interface, ...), and in this manner these sub-projects will be useable in
many other projects other than Lynx.
Lynx is under GNU Public Licence, and GNU encourages open-source
programming. Unreadable source-codes are useless.
--mehran
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- lynx-dev Java version of Lynx, Deckler, Greg, 2000/08/18
- Re: lynx-dev Java version of Lynx, Thomas Dickey, 2000/08/18
- Re: lynx-dev Java version of Lynx, Mehran Mehr, 2000/08/19
- Re: lynx-dev Java version of Lynx, David Woolley, 2000/08/20
- Re: lynx-dev Java version of Lynx, Klaus Weide, 2000/08/20
- Re: lynx-dev Java version of Lynx, David Woolley, 2000/08/21
- Re: lynx-dev Java version of Lynx, John Brajkovic, 2000/08/21
- Re: lynx-dev Java version of Lynx,
Mehran Mehr <=
- Re: lynx-dev Java version of Lynx, mattack, 2000/08/22
- Re: lynx-dev Java version of Lynx, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/08/22