[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: depend take 2
From: |
Christian Hopp |
Subject: |
Re: depend take 2 |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:30:14 +0100 (CET) |
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 address@hidden wrote:
> After poking around, I think the following is the best course of action...
>
> Revert to the old code, and then, regardless of whether we revert or not,
> make the following changes:
> 1) Change the syntax to "depends" and add noise word "on", so we can
> have
>
> check foo
> depends on bar
>
> so it's nice and clear
>
> 2) Remove the sleep statement after spawn-start altogether (I've tested
> this and it's OK)
> 3) Make the timeout counter only update after we try to start something.
> This way, the sleep above is unneccessary.
> What do people think?
+1 from a sunny Berkeley. (-:
Christian
--
Christian Hopp email: address@hidden
Institut für Elektrische Informationstechnik fon: +49-5323-72-2113
TU Clausthal, Leibnizstr. 28, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerf. fax: +49-5323-72-3197
pgpkey: https://www.iei.tu-clausthal.de/pgp-keys/
- Re: depend take 2, (continued)
- Re: depend take 2, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2,
Christian Hopp <=
- Re: depend take 2, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/19
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/19