Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Cvssync status

[Bruce Stephens]

Christof Petig <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

> Last I looked tailor did have shortcomings compared to cvssync for
> this specific task (CVS-monotone synchronization) and seemed rather
> difficult to set up, so I stayed with what I had already achieved. I
> can not comment on the current situation, though.

Absolutely, tailor's good for a particular task, and there are other
tools which are good for others (cvs2svn and tailor are rather
different; the tasks for which you might have a choice between the two
are rather limited).