[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs

From: Brian Downing
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:55:54 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:06:56AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jon Bright:
> > I also agree with this.  For me,
> >
> > 568b-2462-456e-9a57-4326-93df-936d-4835
> >
> > would be much more readable than
> >
> > 568b2462456e9a57432693df936d4835
> Only the latter can be copied to the X selection with a single double
> click.


XTerm*charClass: 45:48

into whatever X resources file you prefer and the former will select the
same as the latter.

("Modern" Linux distributions are starting to throw a huge laundry list
of characters into this group by default, including slash, which annoys
me.  Undoing this behavior is the only reason I'm aware of this

I suppose one could say that 568b_2462_456e_9a57_4326_93df_936d_4835
would select that way by default, but it is less readable than with
hyphens to me.

*** Brian Downing <bdowning at lavos dot net> 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]