[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?) |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:36:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Markus Schiltknecht <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> Sorry, I should have made that clearer. I meant to store something like:
>
> file_foo.txt 1.75
> file_bar.txt 1.9
> TODO 1.1
> README 1.5
>
> per revision. Additionally one could save infos like: 'all CVS commits
> were between 27/08/2006 15:42:13 and 27/08/2006 15:42:19' or even:
> 'this revision overlaps in CVS with MTN revision 359a3f2...'
Ah, OK. Yes, I can see that would work. No idea whether that would
be better or worse than using file attributes. I guess if this were a
cert, then there'd be a potential problem with multiple (incompatible)
certs on the same revision.
[...]
- [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), (continued)
- [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Lapo Luchini, 2006/08/26
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Christof Petig, 2006/08/28
- cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/28
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Christof Petig, 2006/08/28
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Daniel Carosone, 2006/08/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/08/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Bruce Stephens, 2006/08/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/08/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?),
Bruce Stephens <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/08/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/08/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Christof Petig, 2006/08/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Daniel Carosone, 2006/08/23
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Christof Petig, 2006/08/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Christof Petig, 2006/08/25