[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:31:11 -0700 |
On 10/10/07, Daniel Carosone <address@hidden> wrote:
> > My impression is that, while external Boost libraries are now not
> > needed, to get the header-only libraries that we still use, people
> > building from source will still have to go through the trouble of
> > building the whole of Boost.
>
> Depends how their packaging is set up: for comparison and an estimation
> of the number of files involved:
[...]
> So, I'm assuming we should now be able to get away with a dep on just
> boost-headers, which will save a chunk of space and time. Thankyou.
Yes, that should work. (I made effectively the same change for the
Debian packaging.) I was referring to people who start from scratch
with no prepackaged boost.
zw
- [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed, Zack Weinberg, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed, Daniel Carosone, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed, Daniel Carosone, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed, Julio M. Merino Vidal, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed, Daniel Carosone, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed, Julio M. Merino Vidal, 2007/10/11
- Re: [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed, Richard Levitte, 2007/10/11
- Re: [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed, Julio M. Merino Vidal, 2007/10/11
Re: [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed,
Zack Weinberg <=
Re: [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed, Thomas Keller, 2007/10/10
Re: [Monotone-devel] PCRE landed, Richard Levitte, 2007/10/10