[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone
From: |
Thomas Moschny |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:56:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20071204.744707) |
On Monday 28 January 2008, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> Locality on disk, such that commonly the certs that you want to
> request are close together (and so more efficient to read).
>
> I guess lumping certs associated with a revision together might be
> good, but maybe not---maybe you want certs for a particular branch
> close together, and that that's much more important.
Well, I wasn't talking about performance, but about semantic problems, e.g.
the problem that currently certs which are issued in one logical step are only
loosely coupled later on; or that you don't have author or date information
(or a message fwiw) attached to the 'tag', 'suspend' or 'test-result' certs.
- Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [Monotone-devel] Re: symlinks support [Was: Future of monotone], (continued)
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Graydon Hoare, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Bruce Stephens, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Bruce Stephens, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone,
Thomas Moschny <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone, Pavel Cahyna, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Keller, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Derek Scherger, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Nathaniel Smith, 2008/01/28