[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Time for a release

From: Thomas Keller
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Time for a release
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:18:24 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv: Gecko/20100317 SUSE/3.0.4-1.1.1 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4

Am 04.06.2010 05:46, schrieb Derek Scherger:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Thomas Keller <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I've just talked with Thomas Moschny on IRC and I listened again to his
>> and other people's concerns about switching too fast to 1.0. I think the
>> concerns are reasonable, so we've discussed this issue and concluded the
>> following:
>> * The next version of monotone will be named 0.99 and will be the last
>>  version before the final 1.0.0 is out
> I agree with the general concern that we've had a few branches land lately.
> I wouldn't be surprised in the least to hear some screaming when people
> start using the new changelog editor functionality for example. Also,
> restrictions have been changed a bit, diff has also changed slightly, etc.
> Hopefully these changes are all good and generally liked, but the idea of
> changing a bunch of behaviour and then releasing 1.0 shortly afterwards
> seems a bit questionable.

See it this way:
We're just switching to a different versioning scheme :)


GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden |
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]