Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?

[Paul Fox]

david wrote:
 > Paul wrote:
 > 
 > > as far as i can tell, the -noprint switch to the folder command
 > > is inoperative, since a line of code just below the argument parsing
 > > loop sets the default value of printsw to be non-zero.
 > 
 > Yeah, looks like it's always (at least since 1989/06/26) been that way.
 > I use -f(ast), but it looks like -noprint would be a bit more efficient.

but that still prints the folder name, doesn't it?  i think -noprint
might be totally silent.  (of course, since it doesn't work, i don't
actually know.  :-)

paul

 > > i also see that -noprint isn't documented.  perhaps not a coincidence?
 > >
 > > i can fix it, if it seems that i'm reading this right.
 > 
 > Sure.
 > 
 > David
 > 
 > -- 
 > Nmh-workers
 > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
 > 


=----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 1.9 degrees)