[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work? |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:56:01 -0500 |
Paul F. wrote:
> but that still prints the folder name, doesn't it? i think -noprint
> might be totally silent. (of course, since it doesn't work, i don't
> actually know. :-)
Well, it does work with -list:
$ folder -list -print -noprint
inbox
But I would have no objection to changing -noprint to disable output of
the folder name.
David
- [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, David Levine, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?,
David Levine <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, valdis . kletnieks, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/09