[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ...
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ... |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:41:22 -0500 |
On 20-Jun-2003, Andy Adler <address@hidden> wrote:
| Which brings back the question: How far away (realistically) is 3.0?
I'm no good at estimating these kinds of things, but I'd guess more
than 6 months, maybe a year, to do all the things on the list.
So it probably makes sense to come up with some way to drop the 2.0.x
code (which is quite ancient now) without putting everyone on the
bleeding edge.
Which would be better: a "stable" release or just going with the
"works pretty well" model?
jwe
- Re: A group in Norway starts to develop support for multidimensional arrays in Octave., (continued)
- Re: A group in Norway starts to develop support for multidimensional arrays in Octave., Etienne Grossmann, 2003/06/20
- Re: A group in Norway starts to develop support for multidimensional arrays in Octave., Joao Cardoso, 2003/06/20
- Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., Andy Adler, 2003/06/20
- Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., John W. Eaton, 2003/06/20
- Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., Andy Adler, 2003/06/20
- Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., John W. Eaton, 2003/06/20
- Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., Quentin Spencer, 2003/06/20
- Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., Andy Adler, 2003/06/20
- Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., John W. Eaton, 2003/06/20
- Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., Andy Adler, 2003/06/23
- Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ...,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., Dirk Eddelbuettel, 2003/06/20
- Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., Andy Adler, 2003/06/23
- Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., Paul Kienzle, 2003/06/20
- Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., John W. Eaton, 2003/06/21
- Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ..., Paul Kienzle, 2003/06/21