Re: polyint vs polyinteg

[John W. Eaton]

On 31-Aug-2007, David Bateman wrote:

| John W. Eaton wrote:
| > On 31-Aug-2007, Sylvain Pelissier wrote:
| > 
| > | I have already done a polyint function in Octave forge. You could use it
| > | if it could help and tell me when I could delete it in Octave forge.
| > 
| > It looks like your polyint function is just a wrapper around
| > polyinteg.  We need it to be the other way around:  polyint should be
| > the real function and polyinteg (which will be deprecated and removed
| > in the future) should call polyint to do the real work (assuming that
| > it is possible to do that while retaining the existing interface for
| > polyinteg, for backward compatibility).
| > 
| > jwe
| > 
| 
| Then what about the attached..

OK, please check it in.

Thanks,

jwe