Re: polyint vs polyinteg

[David Bateman]

John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 31-Aug-2007, David Bateman wrote:
> 
> | John W. Eaton wrote:
> | > On 31-Aug-2007, Sylvain Pelissier wrote:
> | > 
> | > | I have already done a polyint function in Octave forge. You could use it
> | > | if it could help and tell me when I could delete it in Octave forge.
> | > 
> | > It looks like your polyint function is just a wrapper around
> | > polyinteg.  We need it to be the other way around:  polyint should be
> | > the real function and polyinteg (which will be deprecated and removed
> | > in the future) should call polyint to do the real work (assuming that
> | > it is possible to do that while retaining the existing interface for
> | > polyinteg, for backward compatibility).
> | > 
> | > jwe
> | > 
> | 
> | Then what about the attached..
> 
> OK, please check it in.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jwe
> 

Done and removed from sourceforge...

D.