[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FTGL.h not found
From: |
Jaroslav Hajek |
Subject: |
Re: FTGL.h not found |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:05:57 +0200 |
is it possible to simply support both 2.1.2 and 2.1.3? Or are they too
incompatible?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:43 PM, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
> David Bateman wrote:
>> As far as I can see every RPM based distribution has FTGL 2.1.2 and not
>> 2.1.3 and so the change to check for the header ftgl.h and not FTGL.h
>> means that no RPM based distribution can now use the FTLK backend.
>>
>
> Looking at
>
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=202130
>
> You'll see that FTGL 2.1.3 is at RC5 and is not considered stable, which
> explains why there are no RPM versions of this code. It appears debian
> jumped the gun by upgrading to this version.
>
> D.
>
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
- Re: FTGL.h not found, (continued)
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Shai Ayal, 2008/07/10
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Thomas Weber, 2008/07/10
- Re: FTGL.h not found, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/10
- Re: FTGL.h not found, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/10
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Thomas Treichl, 2008/07/10
- Re: FTGL.h not found, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/10
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Thomas Treichl, 2008/07/11
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Thomas Treichl, 2008/07/11
- Re: FTGL.h not found, David Bateman, 2008/07/17
- Re: FTGL.h not found, David Bateman, 2008/07/17
- Re: FTGL.h not found,
Jaroslav Hajek <=
- Re: FTGL.h not found, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/18
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/07/18
- Re: FTGL.h not found, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/21
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Michael Goffioul, 2008/07/21
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Thomas Weber, 2008/07/27