[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Octave" namespace for Octave C++ sources for 3.2?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: "Octave" namespace for Octave C++ sources for 3.2? |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:51:24 -0400 |
On 6-Aug-2008, Michael Goffioul wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:08 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
| > I'd like to consider wrapping Octave's classes in a separate
| > namespace. I think we could do it for 3.2, but maybe there is some
| > reason to avoid this change? Does anyone have any strong objections
| > to doing this? Other comments?
|
| When wrapping into an octave namespace, would you end up (for instance)
| with octave::octave_value or with octave::value? More generally, do you
| intend to keep the octave_ prefix?.
I'd like to eliminate some of them. I'm not sure we have to remove
all of them. Even if we do remove some, I think we could use typedefs
to keep the old names around, at least for some time (years, probably).
jwe