|
From: | Daniel J Sebald |
Subject: | Re: [OctDev] complex error function |
Date: | Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:01:14 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 |
On 11/20/2012 07:43 PM, Nir Krakauer wrote:
Can the contributed functions be given names that don't conflict with the current Octave ones, like erf_complex? That way there should be no problem with putting them either in specfun or as their own Octave package.
That's an alternative. Yet it might be desired to have complex error function family of functions:
octave-cli:3> erfc(complex(1,pi)) error: erfc: not defined for complex scalar Will this code work for that?If Steven's code were released as a mini C library that could be accessed easily and had some compile switches to use internal square root, sinc, etc. functions or external, that might address Jordi's concern about maintaining the code.
Dan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |