octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages


From: Philip Nienhuis
Subject: Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 09:44:25 -0700 (PDT)

Mike Miller-4 wrote
> Dear Octave Forge maintainers,
> 
> The first 4.0 release candidate has been out for some time now and we
> don't expect any further changes to impact Octave Forge package
> compatibility. At this time we would like to call for Octave Forge
> package maintainers to release updated versions of packages if needed
> that will build and work with the coming Octave release.
> 
> For informational purposes, the current released versions of the
> following packages fail to build properly with the first release
> candidate:
> 
>  * communications
>  * control
>  * dicom
>  * image
>  * odepkg
>  * windows

Not being able to be built is one thing; but some packages are wholly or
partly incompatible or will break things if installed in a too new Octave
release. As a result user code may fail without any clue that an old OF
package is the cause.

E.g., general-1.3.4 overloads inputParser with outdated code. One
consequence is that some OF linear-algebra functions won't work properly if
general-1.3.4 is loaded.
Another PITA is the java package; we've had recurrent questions in the help
ML from users trying to install it in 3.8.2+
specfun still overloads erfcinv(), expint() and ellipj().

I sometimes think it may be a good thing to renew some existing OF package
releases with the only change being a maximum Octave version check, so that
unwary users at least have a warning that the package is incompatible with
the Octave version at hand.

Philip




--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Octave-Forge-Octave-4-0-call-for-packages-tp4669204p4669600.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]