Re: [Protux-devel] MustuxAudioBus, FileBrowser...

[rsff]

If i'm not mistaken (i have not been able to compile protux for
sometime, because of lack of time, and some conflicts in my box. I
should reinstall and change to debian unstable...), last time I checked
the in the FileBrowser/manager, there was still no way to save, delete,
copy, create and manage in general the following "objects": projects
(consist a a group of songs), and songs (a group of recorded or imported
tracks), with their respective properties, and edits..

This is something that protux needed for a long time. Perhaps, if it has
not been implemented, you could work on that...

Fabio.

PS: I really need to fix my box. Whenever i try to install qt3, (which
for some reason was uninstalled!), it tries to uninstall parts of my
gnome desktop, which i need badly. so i'm not able to compile. *sniff,
sniff!*


Em Ter, 2003-09-23 às 07:58, Remon Sijrier escreveu: 
> > as far as I remember there is a play functionallity planned inside
> > FileBrowser (the button is already there), which would be very helpful to
> > have; maybe you like to add this?
> 
> I'll tried it actually last weekend, but something didn't work as expected so 
> I have delayed it.
> 
> >
> > Aahh ... apropos <FS> ... I remember about a problem during import;
> > couldn't be canceled. Is this already fixed (sorry, I'm not at home so I
> > can't check this)?
> 
> This is not fixed, sorry. But it can be implemented, if  you want :-)
> 
> > Also it would be helpful to have a scale on peak meters and maybe added to
> > the clips/tracks as well or having maybe (some of) the "several play modes"
> > (WISHLIST) or a scrub tool ?
> 
> Ehm, can you please explain this a bit more to me? I'm really not such an 
> experienced audio-program user, and much of the terminologie isn't making 
> sense to me :-(
> But a scale on the peak meters is indeed something I'm missing all the time.
> It's not to difficult to add, so just wait and see :-)
> 
> > But since you guys are in stabilization mode this are maybe some tasks that
> > has to wait to be worked on after the 0.20 release?
> 
> Probably yes.....
> 
> Remon
> 
> P.S.
> But there are still things that need to be implemented before 0.20.0 which 
> Luciano is working on, so I can give it a try :-)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Protux-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel

-- 

rsff <address@hidden>