[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule?
From: |
Jim C. Brown |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule? |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:56:33 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:26:45AM +0200, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 05:58:58PM -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> > I am curious, what is wrong with using Xlib directly? Would you accept an
> > Xlib patch if it was simple enough to understand?
>
> Well, the problem with using Xlib directly instead of via SDL is that you
> loose easy portability to the Win32 platform
So? Fabrice has said that he'll add support got the Win32 GUI directly if some
one sends a patch for it ... surely this makes it hard to port to the Linux
platform???
The idea is, use XLib when qemu is compiled under a *nix, use Win32 for Windows,
the OSX Gui (Aqua?) for Mac OS X, etc. I don't see what the problem here is.
Furthermore, there is a patch for Xlib already. So I ask, why not?
>(except if you ask people to
> install an X server in Windows :-) ).
>
Not a bad idea imho, tho not optimal.
> Lionel
>
> --
> Lionel Ulmer - http://www.bbrox.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>
--
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule?, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule?, Jeebs, 2004/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule?, Magnus Damm, 2004/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule?, Jim C. Brown, 2004/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule?, Daniel Serpell, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule?, Jim C. Brown, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule?, John R. Hogerhuis, 2004/09/02
Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule?, Jim C. Brown, 2004/09/02