[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat
From: |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Nov 2007 18:12:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) |
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:05:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Has Thiemo already said, there is no IEEE behavior. If you look at the
> IEEE 754 document you will see that it has requirements on what should
> be supported by an IEEE compliant FPU, but has very few requirements on
> the implementation.
If folks don't like the target conditionals there, I recommend we just
set some low bit to be sure it's a NaN and move on. The softfloat
implementation is not all that close to matching any one hardware FPU.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, Aurelien Jarno, 2007/11/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2007/11/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, Aurelien Jarno, 2007/11/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, Aurelien Jarno, 2007/11/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, J. Mayer, 2007/11/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, Aurelien Jarno, 2007/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, J. Mayer, 2007/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, Aurelien Jarno, 2007/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, J. Mayer, 2007/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, Aurelien Jarno, 2007/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, J. Mayer, 2007/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, Thiemo Seufer, 2007/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat, Aurelien Jarno, 2007/11/10