[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization test
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:00:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 |
Il 09/03/2012 15:43, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
> Linux is the only part that matters here. The userspace in qemu-jeos
> is just there to give a small environment for Linux to function
> properly in.
But again that's not okay for all testcases. If I want to do SCSI
tests, I cannot write them in shell scripts because qemu-jeos does not
have sg3_utils.
Even libos would not help; relying on sg3_utils means that the client is
a completely clear reimplementation. I don't care about the extra trips
to the SCSI specs that sg3_utils would save. The problem is that since
qtest cannot run on real hardware, I don't have confirmation that I
didn't misinterpret the standards. Writing all bits of the testsuite
makes it likely to have the same misinterpretations in both the tested
code and the tests, even if I try to write the tests from scratch with
only the spec in front of me.
> I'm skeptical of the value of this from a QEMU point of view. Do we
> really care if the buildroot version of udev propagates hotplug
> events correct in buildroot for ARM in a beagleboard machine?
I don't care about udev. But even just binutils+GCC+kernel+uclibc is
not as easy if you care about dozens of architectures.
Paolo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Anthony Liguori, 2012/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues, 2012/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Anthony Liguori, 2012/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues, 2012/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Andreas Färber, 2012/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Anthony Liguori, 2012/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Anthony Liguori, 2012/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Anthony Liguori, 2012/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Anthony Liguori, 2012/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Anthony Liguori, 2012/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Anthony Liguori, 2012/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Cleber Rosa, 2012/03/09
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests, Ademar Reis, 2012/03/08