qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16] introduce OptsVisitor, rebase -net/-netde


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16] introduce OptsVisitor, rebase -net/-netdev parsing
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 15:31:20 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120421 Thunderbird/12.0

Am 06.06.2012 15:03, schrieb Laszlo Ersek:
> On 06/05/12 23:13, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
>> There is one small mistake that needs to be addressed in a v2, so it
>> would be great if you could use the int*_t visitors to avoid
>> complicating the code with range checks.
> 
> OK so this is what I see:
> 
> (a) add < 0 checks to <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/150427/> and
>     include it in the series,
> (b) make all Netdev integer types as strict as possible, remove
>     superfluous checks,
> (c) render NetLegacy::name optional.
> 
> How do I lay out (a)? Should I include the patch verbatim first (with
> proper From: and Signed-off-by: lines) and then modify it in a small
> followup, or squash those two and... what? :)

I am missing context here. The referenced patch is on qom-next already
and will thus be in my upcoming PULL (today or tomorrow) unless someone
comments on that patch, cc'ing me, that there's an error. Feel free to
cherry-pick from there but do not squash into random series please.

I don't understand what < 0 checks you are talking about, lacking time
to go through this QIDL patch series ATM.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]