qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 03/14] quorum: ignore 0-length child


From: Wen Congyang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 03/14] quorum: ignore 0-length child
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:33:28 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0

On 02/24/2015 04:43 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 2015-02-11 at 22:07, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> We connect to NBD server when starting block replication, so
>> the length is 0 before starting block replication.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>   block/quorum.c | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/quorum.c b/block/quorum.c
>> index 5ed1ff8..e6aff5f 100644
>> --- a/block/quorum.c
>> +++ b/block/quorum.c
>> @@ -734,6 +734,11 @@ static int64_t quorum_getlength(BlockDriverState *bs)
>>           if (value < 0) {
>>               return value;
>>           }
>> +
>> +        if (!value) {
>> +            continue;
>> +        }
>> +
>>           if (value != result) {
>>               return -EIO;
>>           }
> 
> Hm, what do you think about some specific error value returned by your 
> delayed NBD implementation? Like -ENOTCONN or something like that? Then we'd 
> be able to discern a real 0-length block device from a not-yet-connected NBD 
> server.
> 
> Also, while you did write that one shouldn't be using the NBD client as the 
> first quorum child, I think we should try to support that case anyway. For 
> this patch, that means accepting that bdrv_getlength(s->bs[0]) may be off.

Good idea. I will try it.

Thanks
Wen Congyang

> 
> Max
> .
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]