qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 09/11] target-arm: dfilter support for in_asm


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 09/11] target-arm: dfilter support for in_asm, op, opt_op
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:26:23 +0100

Richard Henderson <address@hidden> writes:

> On 08/03/2015 02:14 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Each individual architecture needs to use the qemu_log_in_addr_range()
>> feature for enabling in_asm and marking blocks for op/opt_op output.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target-arm/translate-a64.c | 6 ++++--
>>  target-arm/translate.c     | 6 ++++--
>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/target-arm/translate-a64.c b/target-arm/translate-a64.c
>> index 689f2be..0b0f4ae 100644
>> --- a/target-arm/translate-a64.c
>> +++ b/target-arm/translate-a64.c
>> @@ -11026,7 +11026,8 @@ void gen_intermediate_code_internal_a64(ARMCPU *cpu,
>>              gen_io_start();
>>          }
>>  
>> -        if (unlikely(qemu_loglevel_mask(CPU_LOG_TB_OP | 
>> CPU_LOG_TB_OP_OPT))) {
>> +        if (unlikely(qemu_loglevel_mask(CPU_LOG_TB_OP | CPU_LOG_TB_OP_OPT) 
>> &&
>> +                     qemu_log_in_addr_range(dc->pc))) {
>>              tcg_gen_debug_insn_start(dc->pc);
>>          }
>
> If there's more than one or two ranges, it's probably quicker to
> generate the debug opcode regardless of the range.  Remember, this
> check is happening once per insn, not once per tb.

Maybe I should hoist the check up to the start of a block? This would
mean we would dump all instructions in a block even if they went past
the end-point but the reverse case is probably just confusing.

We'll still not dump anything that starts outside the range.

>
>
> r~

-- 
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]