qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] VFIO based vGPU(was Re: [Announcement] 2015-Q3 release


From: Tian, Kevin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] VFIO based vGPU(was Re: [Announcement] 2015-Q3 release of XenGT - a Mediated ...)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:15:43 +0000

> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 6:08 AM
> 
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Today KVMGT (not using VFIO yet) registers I/O emulation callbacks to
> > > > KVM, so VM MMIO access will be forwarded to KVMGT directly for
> > > > emulation in kernel. If we reuse above R/W flags, the whole emulation
> > > > path would be unnecessarily long with obvious performance impact. We
> > > > either need a new flag here to indicate in-kernel emulation (bias from
> > > > passthrough support), or just hide the region alternatively (let KVMGT
> > > > to handle I/O emulation itself like today).
> > >
> > > That sounds like a future optimization TBH.  There's very strict
> > > layering between vfio and kvm.  Physical device assignment could make
> > > use of it as well, avoiding a round trip through userspace when an
> > > ioread/write would do.  Userspace also needs to orchestrate those kinds
> > > of accelerators, there might be cases where userspace wants to see those
> > > transactions for debugging or manipulating the device.  We can't simply
> > > take shortcuts to provide such direct access.  Thanks,
> > >
> >
> > But we have to balance such debugging flexibility and acceptable 
> > performance.
> > To me the latter one is more important otherwise there'd be no real usage
> > around this technique, while for debugging there are other alternative (e.g.
> > ftrace) Consider some extreme case with 100k traps/second and then see
> > how much impact a 2-3x longer emulation path can bring...
> 
> Are you jumping to the conclusion that it cannot be done with proper
> layering in place?  Performance is important, but it's not an excuse to
> abandon designing interfaces between independent components.  Thanks,
> 

Two are not controversial. My point is to remove unnecessary long trip
as possible. After another thought, yes we can reuse existing read/write
flags:
        - KVMGT will expose a private control variable whether in-kernel
delivery is required;
        - when the variable is true, KVMGT will register in-kernel MMIO 
emulation callbacks then VM MMIO request will be delivered to KVMGT 
directly;
        - when the variable is false, KVMGT will not register anything. 
VM MMIO request will then be delivered to Qemu and then ioread/write
will be used to finally reach KVMGT emulation logic;

Thanks
Kevin

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]