[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: changing ROM bundling in tar dists for releases
From: |
Gerd Hoffmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: changing ROM bundling in tar dists for releases |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Sep 2017 10:31:17 +0200 |
Hi,
> > - The qemu release dists get ever larger as we add more ROMS.
> > Adding
> > EFI ROM builds for i386, x86_64, and aarch64 will make the dists
> > larger still.
>
> I think these make sense. Should we tie this into the
> recent suggestion (by Gerd?) that we should put all the
> rom blobs into git submodules, and otherwise generally
> try to regularise our handling of blobs?
It surely makes sense to consider both together, so we can work out a
reasonable workflow for firmware updates and distribution.
I think it makes sense to create a separate project for the firmware
blobs. Move over the firmware binaries and source submodules to the
new project. This way updating both firmware sources and binaries can
be done with a single commit, like we handle this today, just in the
new firmware repo instead of the main qemu repo.
When moving only the binaries to a separate git submodule and
continuing to have the sources as main qemu repo submodules firmware
updates become more complicated.
> > 3. Change existing dist, and add a new one with bundled bits
> >
> > qemu-X.Y.Z.tar.bz2 - qemu source only
> > qemu-addons-X.Y.Z.tar.bz2 - bundled ROMS + libs
With the scheme above it makes sense to have a qemu-firmware-
${version}.tar.gz addon tarball. Maybe even two (one with the prebuilt
binaries and one with the sources).
Question is what to do with the non-firmware submodules (pixman, dtc,
more?) then. I think they are not that big, so I doubt it is worth the
hassle to create two tarball versions. And license-wise it isn't a
issue too.
cheers,
Gerd
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: changing ROM bundling in tar dists for releases,
Gerd Hoffmann <=