[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] monitor: more comments on lock-free flei
From: |
Peter Xu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] monitor: more comments on lock-free fleids/funcs |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2018 16:48:44 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) |
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:41:09AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Regarding the subject: what are "fleids"?
Ouch. :( I meant the word "fields".
>
> Peter Xu <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Add some explicit comment for both Readline and cpu_set/cpu_get helpers
> > that they do not need the mon_lock protection.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > monitor.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> > index d6c3c08932..f01589f945 100644
> > --- a/monitor.c
> > +++ b/monitor.c
> > @@ -207,7 +207,16 @@ struct Monitor {
> > int suspend_cnt; /* Needs to be accessed atomically */
> > bool skip_flush;
> > bool use_io_thr;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * State used only in the thread "owning" the monitor.
> > + * If @use_io_thr, this is mon_global.mon_iothread.
> > + * Else, it's the main thread.
> > + * These members can be safely accessed without locks.
> > + */
> > ReadLineState *rs;
> > + // other members that aren't shared
>
> Whoops, misunderstanding! I meant this line as a placeholder, to
> further illustrate my intent. It should not be committed. If we need a
> comment here, it should use /* traditional comment syntax */.
My fault.
Please let me know if you want me to repost... Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/4] monitor: add lock to protect mon_fdsets, Peter Xu, 2018/05/24
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/4] monitor: add lock to protect mon_fdsets, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2018/05/24