[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/3] intel-iommu: differentiate host address
From: |
Peter Xu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/3] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width. |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:15:46 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 07:49:45PM +0800, Yu Zhang wrote:
> Currently, vIOMMU is using the value of IOVA address width, instead of
> the host address width(HAW) to calculate the number of reserved bits in
> data structures such as root entries, context entries, and entries of
> DMA paging structures etc.
>
> However values of IOVA address width and of the HAW may not equal. For
> example, a 48-bit IOVA can only be mapped to host addresses no wider than
> 46 bits. Using 48, instead of 46 to calculate the reserved bit may result
> in an invalid IOVA being accepted.
>
> To fix this, a new field - haw_bits is introduced in struct IntelIOMMUState,
> whose value is initialized based on the maximum physical address set to
> guest CPU. Also, definitions such as VTD_HOST_AW_39/48BIT etc. are renamed
> to clarify.
IIRC I raised this question some time ago somewhere but no one
remembered to follow that up. Thanks for fixing it.
It looks mostly good to me, only one tiny comment below...
[...]
> @@ -887,6 +887,7 @@ static int vtd_page_walk_level(dma_addr_t addr, uint64_t
> start,
> uint64_t iova = start;
> uint64_t iova_next;
> int ret = 0;
> + uint8_t haw = info->as->iommu_state->haw_bits;
For now vtd_page_walk_info->aw_bits caches the GAW information and we
use a single vtd_page_walk_info during one page walk, maybe we can
also do the same for HAW instead of fetching it every time here from
info->as->iommu_state->haw_bits?
Regards,
--
Peter Xu
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/3] intel-iommu: add support for 5-level virtual IOMMU., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/09
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/3] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/3] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width.,
Peter Xu <=
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Peter Xu, 2018/11/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Peter Xu, 2018/11/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Peter Xu, 2018/11/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Peter Xu, 2018/11/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/13