[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to all
From: |
Peter Xu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width. |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:36:34 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 07:49:46PM +0800, Yu Zhang wrote:
> A 5-level paging capable VM may choose to use 57-bit IOVA address width.
> E.g. guest applications like DPDK prefer to use its VA as IOVA when
> performing VFIO map/unmap operations, to avoid the burden of managing the
> IOVA space.
Since you mentioned about DPDK... I'm just curious that whether have
you tested the patchset with the 57bit-enabled machines with DPDK VA
mode running in the guest? That would be something nice to mention in
the cover letter if you have.
[...]
> @@ -3264,11 +3286,19 @@ static bool vtd_decide_config(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> Error **errp)
> }
> }
>
> - /* Currently only address widths supported are 39 and 48 bits */
> + /* Currently address widths supported are 39, 48, and 57 bits */
> if ((s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_39BIT) &&
> - (s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_48BIT)) {
> - error_setg(errp, "Supported values for x-aw-bits are: %d, %d",
> - VTD_AW_39BIT, VTD_AW_48BIT);
> + (s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_48BIT) &&
> + (s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_57BIT)) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Supported values for x-aw-bits are: %d, %d, %d",
> + VTD_AW_39BIT, VTD_AW_48BIT, VTD_AW_57BIT);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if ((s->aw_bits == VTD_AW_57BIT) &&
> + !(host_has_la57() && guest_has_la57())) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Do not support 57-bit DMA address, unless both "
> + "host and guest are capable of 5-level paging.\n");
Is there any context (or pointer to previous discussions would work
too) on explaining why we don't support some scenarios like
host_paw=48,guest_paw=48,guest_gaw=57?
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/3] intel-iommu: add support for 5-level virtual IOMMU., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/09
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/3] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/09
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width.,
Peter Xu <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Peter Xu, 2018/11/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Peter Xu, 2018/11/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Peter Xu, 2018/11/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/13
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] intel-iommu: search iotlb for levels supported by the address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/11/09