qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] pc: acpi: use correct RSDT length for check


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] pc: acpi: use correct RSDT length for checksum
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 11:21:57 +0100

On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:10:01 -0500
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 11:29:33AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > AcpiRsdpDescriptor describes revision 2 RSDP table so using sizeof(*rsdp)
> > for checksum calculation isn't correct since we are adding extra 16 bytes.
> > But acpi_data_push() zeroes out table, so just by luck we are summing up
> > exta zeros which still yelds correct checksum.
> > 
> > Fix it up by explicitly stating table size instead of using
> > pointer arithmetics on stucture.
> > 
> > PS:
> > Extra 16 bytes are still wasted, but droping them will break migration
> > for machines older than 2.3 due to size mismatch, for 2.3 and older it's
> > not an issue since they are using resizable memory regions (a1666142d)
> > for ACPI blobs. So keep wasting memory to avoid breaking old machines.  
> 
> I'd like this explanation in code comments please.
sure, I'll move it there

> > Fixes: 72c194f7e (i386: ACPI table generation code from seabios)
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > there is no changes to the current RSDP content caused by this patch
> > ---
> >  hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > index 236a20e..131c565 100644
> > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > @@ -2567,7 +2567,7 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker, 
> > unsigned rsdt_tbl_offset)
> >  
> >      /* Checksum to be filled by Guest linker */
> >      bios_linker_loader_add_checksum(linker, ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE,
> > -        (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data, sizeof *rsdp,
> > +        (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data, 20 /* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */,
> >          (char *)&rsdp->checksum - rsdp_table->data);
> >  
> >      return rsdp_table;  
> 
> I dislike hard-coded size math like this.
I thought we had a consensus on this point. i.e.
replace all packed structures with build_append_int_noprefix() API
and use spec defined values directly (with comments), so whenever
we compare spec definition with qemu code it would be 1:1 match.

> How about a sub-structure for RSDPv1?
Structure won't be used for long, this patch fixes immediate error
and Samuel is preparing series that's generalizing build_rsdp() switching
to build_append_int_noprefix() API and dropping no longer used structure
so it couldn't be misused.

> > -- 
> > 2.7.4  




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]